End of the welfare state.....

Thousands of seriously ill cancer patients will be forced to take medical tests and face "back to work" interviews, despite assurances from ministers that they would not make it harder for the sick to get welfare, charities have warned.

Buried in a report to ministers by Prof Malcolm Harrington, the government adviser on testing welfare recipients, are proposals to force cancer patients who are undergoing intravenous chemotherapy to prove they are too ill to work.

At present, patients who are unable to work because of cancer and the side-effects of treatments are allowed to claim the highest rate of employment support allowance (ESA), worth up to £100 a week. More than 9,000 cancer patients were placed automatically on the welfare payment from October 2008 to June 2010. However, the expert report says this "automatic entitlement" has encouraged dependency on benefits, "encouraging wrong behaviours from employers and stigmatising cancer as something that can lead to unemployment or worklessness".

Instead, cancer patients on chemotherapy in hospitals will now have to prove that they are too sick to work, and take part in the controversial work capability assessment to determine whether someone is eligible for benefits. If cancer patients are found able to return to employment they may also be required to participate in work-related practice job interviews, as a condition of receiving their benefit.

Such assessments have been attacked by charities amid mounting evidence that people with serious illnesses are being judged fit for work when they are not.

Cancer experts and 30 cancer charities argue that patients undergoing "stressful" cancer treatment – and who have to leave work – should be automatically eligible for ESA. Ciarán Devane, chief executive of Macmillan Cancer Support, said: "Cancer patients in the middle of treatment are, in many cases, fighting for their lives.

"Yet the government is proposing to change the rules so all cancer patients will have to undergo a stressful assessment to prove they are unable to work.

"This shows a clear disregard and misunderstanding of what it's like to undergo punishing treatment. Patients who previously had peace of mind would face the stress and practical difficulties of getting assessed for work they are too poorly to do."

The new policy also reverses the government's own position on benefits that can be obtained by cancer patients. Iain Duncan Smith, the work and pensions secretary, earlier this year amended regulations concerning ESA so that even patients who were likely to receive chemotherapy within six months would be exempted from medical tests and face-to-face interviews and get benefits automatically.

This move allowed him to taunt Labour, claiming: "It was this government who exempted cancer patients on chemotherapy in hospitals; they were not exempted by the previous government. Our record on this is therefore quite good."

Labour called on the government to "listen very carefully" to its critics on the issue. The shadow work and pensions secretary, Liam Byrne, said: "This government is simply not thinking hard enough about the special circumstances of cancer sufferers in this country. People with obviously serious conditions don't need to be tested and retested – they should be allowed to get on with their treatment."

The government has already been forced on to the back foot over its changes to ESA, designed to save more than £1.2bn. In the summer, David Cameron refused to back down over plans to cut up to £94 a week from ESA, a move that could affect as many as 7,000 cancer patients. Devane said: "To make matters worse, the government is pressing ahead with proposed changes in the welfare reform bill that will make 7,000 cancer patients lose ESA after 12 months simply because they have not recovered quickly enough. We hope ministers will rethink these proposals.

"Cancer is the toughest fight many people will have to face; the government should not be making it tougher for them."

The ESA replaces a range of incapacity benefits. All fresh claimants now undergo a work capability assessment, and 1.5 million existing recipients will be reassessed using the new system from this month. The welfare reform bill introduces a one-year time limit on those people claiming ESA in the "work-related activity group", who are expected to move into work.

In an email, Harrington said: "Macmillan provided me with compelling evidence that different cancer treatments can have an equally – and varied – debilitating effect on individuals. However, I agree with the government that forcing people to a life on benefits when they want to work is wrong." The government said that patients would be allowed to prove they were too ill to work with "documentation", and would not always be asked to undergo a complete assessment.

A DWP spokesman said: "This must be about an individual's needs. Our proposals would ensure a person would only be asked to attend a face-to-face assessment where absolutely necessary."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/dec/06/cancer-patients-welfare-work-tests?CMP=NECNETTXT8187&google_editors_picks=true

New labours dead long live Newer Labour

a simple question: will a spending option directly boost short
and long-term growth and create jobs? This may mean very constrained funding for healthcare,
pensions and welfare for the foreseeable future. It’s tough, but the alternative is ducking the genuine
decisions nearly every government of an
advanced economy currently faces.


http://www.policy-network.net/publications/4101/-In-the-black-Labour


Dear god this is so New labour they even have the gaul to tell us it's from the centre left, hit those on the bottom while helping society.

We now have the the Rich, umnmper middle class, middle class, and those at the bottom who are basically not the same as us.


new labour is alive and it's doing pretty good

Labour new idealism for the Red book

http://eoin-clarke.blogspot.com/2011/09/on-september-25-labour-left-formerly.html


Labours dead.

Labour five point plan

1.A £2bn tax on bank bonuses to fund 100,000 jobs for young people.


2. Bringing forward long term investment projects such as schools, roads and transport to get people back to work and strengthen the economy for the future.

3. Reversing the VAT rise giving a couple with children a £450 boost - immediate help for our high streets and for struggling families and pensioners.

4. A one year cut in VAT to 5% on home improvements -Repairs and maintenance to help homeowners and small businesses.

5. A one year National insurance tax break for every small firm which takes on extra workers - helping small businesses to grow and create jobs.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's it, this is what labour intends to get the UK working again, Labour will bring ahead long term rebuilding on hospitals and schools using of course PFI, which will add to the massive debt labour hid for so long.


Yes but VAT cuts will help, no it will not every large scale company which sells to the public like building supplies have taken the VAT cut and cut that much again to get people through the doors, B&Q has cut and cut again, but people know this country is in a mess and they have decided to pay off credit cards and bills, and of course in a Labour and Tory world that's bad it's people not spending or borrowing from the banks.

I went down to my bank last week to take out a short term loan, I have had five loans in my life time each £1000 has been repaid on time no problems, they told me my rating had been dropped from an A to a D, I asked why? what's gone wrong, well your on benefits and you might lose them, might lose them, I asked what about if I was working he said well your income would be low we only lend now to people within an income of £30,000 and he said we use a firm now to check out your rating( experian), I said OK no problem I'll take my business to the COOP, after an hour I got the loan, only if I put my home on the line, god Almighty little wonder people are not spending.


But to be honest in the end we are hearing that the lowest workers will now be removed from paying tax those who earn £9000 oh big bloody deal.


I do not know, and then that idiot Jamie Oliver comes on TV to tell us kids are fat, he's been on a diet for a year because he became a fat slob.

Back the stike of course I do how many in labour do thats the question

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBl2vUdXgw0&feature=share

hard month

I was given new medication for the stroke last month and I have been feeling so tired, one day I slept in total 48 hours, my wife failed to wake me up doctors called, hospital. It took four weeks to find out the dam medication was working against each other and sending me into this coma like sleep. Some will say thank god.

But it's taken me four weeks to get rid of this medication out of my system, this week I have only been sleeping nine hours during the day, my worry i was like this when I had my stroke so tired.

Thankfully that one is sorted out again.

Black white, green pink

Today we are looking at the black player of the FA award, so all black players get together to get an award. Forgive me but is that not racist, if I started an award for the white player the best white players I would be called BNP EDL and many other names. Yet we now have groups within Football who are split into racial groups, In London £3 million was give by Labour to set up the Bangladeshi cricket league, you can only be Bangladeshi but is that not wrong, should not everything in the UK be open to everyone, we are hearing of a Muslim only football league.

I'm I the rascist.......

Floundering or refounding

It's conference and Labours going to work harder for the Tory swing voters, or as labour calls them the squeezed middle. We are told this is re-founding labour, they cannot regain the thousand if not hundreds of thousands of people who walked away, and they'll have one hell of a task to get the 5 million voters who just walked away. So labour has a plan people will just be moved from the Union levy to become well phantom members, even though we are already classed as Affiliated members anyway.

And you can register to become so called associated members people who have no interest in politics or labour but for a laugh might want to register, you get a leadership vote once 50,000 of you bother to join.

Then you have Blue Labour who will advise Miliband about becoming a Blue labour person, and then you have we are told Purple labour who will beat up Blue labour to take the prize of being well New Labour again, with god being in the back ground, did I write God, sorry Tony Blair.

I asked writing what will become of welfare to be told people will have to work, no more free meals, so no more free meals? what ever that means, because the Poor old taxing paying hard working middle class are fed up paying for free meals and Immigrants.

God the world has changed now people are seen as being a waste of space in Labour new world of Tory-ism

Good old Tories nice to see them back

The former Tory peer also claimed Indian families had a different mentality to Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities in the UK.

"Indians have fallen into the pattern here," she told peers. "They do not have large families because they are like the Jews of old. They want their children to be educated.

"This is the other problem - there is no emphasis on education in the Pakistani and Bangladeshi families."

Baroness Flather called for a gradual reduction in benefits in order to discourage large families and suggested payments should be reduced after a couple's first two children.

She said: "I really feel that for the first two children there should be a full raft of benefits, for the third child three-quarters and for the fourth child a half."

Baroness Flather's comments were not well-received by Labour work and pensions spokesman Lord McKenzie.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-14909062


You cannot beat the Tories for giving out the truth and then telling people my people the Indian community do not have large families, they do not well I must be missing something unless my town has something in the water.

As for labour well they will protect the immigrants while telling the disabled your breeding to many cripples.

Justice Riots and Crime

We all know about the Riots and jail terms and getting kicked out of your home.

Tonight I watched a program about George Abrue and his gang Boiler room scam.

£20 million stolen and spent, two people now with strokes and heart attacks, Mr Abrue who is a well known Gangster, gets Five years because he pleaded Guilty.

He will be out in 2.5 years the Police state millions are missing.

So lets just say he has stashed three million, hows that for making a profit.
Better then nicking two bottles of water.

Harriet cannot do wrong, and she says she should be second in comand...

Former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has defended her use of two day-release prisoners to paint her £450,000 home when they should have been doing community work.

Prison bosses have now launched an investigation into how the pair, who were working for free as part of a back-to-work scheme and were meant to be improving parks and clearing up rubbish-strewn streams, instead ended up spending two days redecorating a room in Miss Smith’s house last month.
Speaking on an LBC radio programme, she was guest presenting, Miss Smith said she wanted 'to set the record a little bit straight' and insisted the prisoners 'didn't have anything else on'.
It also emerged that, as payment for the work, Miss Smith donated an unspecified amount to a local charity which organised the project, the Batchley Support Group


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2029437/Jacqui-Smith-defends-use-2-prisoners-paint-450k-home.html#ixzz1VyZrkvhB


Nothing like being a socialist.....

Draper, he's back

Our Dearly beloved Drapper remember this chap and Labour, he's back he's within the Blue Labour camp, seems blue labour is the camp for Failed MP's ( Purnell) or advisors, it seems a New Book which will tell us about how New sorry Blue labour will envolve, to become a major player will be printed by Drapers new media company.

Thats one way to get back in, but I suspect really labour voters will look at this and see Blue Labour for what it is, a group of people rejected in the main trying to sneak back in through the back door.
Thank god I've left the dam party if failed in more ways then one.

WCA

I'm told I need to get doctors letters of course £75, I will need to have a letter from all the consultants who will all tell everyone how serious fucked up my life is. cost well lets see £225 each were talking £1000.

Then I will need social services to tell these twats of so called ATOS doctors yes he is a risk yes he will cut his wrist, but he has some money to pay for a letter.

well sorry this ATOS doctor will need to work when he see's me no letters no medical documents, the DWP already has these they paid for them if they want them again they know where the doctors are.

I have not seen a specialist for six months and have no intention of going back to be told sorry no more we can do for you get on with life the best you can.

We are now told if your seen planting flowers in a garden or painting a fence from your wheelchair then your not bed bound, if you can drive a car I was told last month then you can drive a bus or a taxi, except of course the DVLA would need to give me back my full driving licence.


So what the fuck is going on are we saying now a person who cannot walk should not try or should not have a go are we saying sitting in a wheelchair gardening now means I can drive an HGV lorry.

So what is going on, I already get told by the Job center to check jobs at home do not come to the job center because we are to busy, if I check the computer where is the help which was promised, if they mean by help a snotty eighteen year old who will not shake your hands because you have something and might pass it on.

Riots was it the disabled that caused it, well yes we have done verything else.

London's burning, it was not me it was him

London's Burning and the police are standing watching, as one young officer stated all I had was my shirt, my stab proof vest and my shield not a lot you can do with that, true.

But who are these people that caused this battle, well one day it was Black drug dealers fighting over drugs, then it was council house scum, then it was sewer rats, one shop owner who had her BMW out side the shop felt it was the scum the dreggs of society.

But who did the Tories think it was, well we had they will have their council houses removed, we cannot have these people living in council houses, that should give Ms Flint on the opposition benches a furry feeling of happyness because labour wanted to do the same to the workless.

But hold on one person in court father owns a news paper, his daughter is a director of a company, another is a sports person, another is a social worker, another well you get the idea these are a cross section of society, I suspect they all got involved in the Riot and did not need or want a TV or a bottle of water, but just well got involved.

Ms May feels it's just crime everyone is a criminal she said it tens times in one interview, crime and criminals, these people are not human, but of course they are, they are humans and they are a cross section opf society. It must be annoying to see these people are not from council houses because it does not allow New or Newer labour to get into bed with the Tories.

Least we forget

Army soldiers Police with guns...................

HIS name was Major Brownlow Stuart and, as he faced what he regarded as a rebellious mob, he called up five marksmen. The order was barked: “Fire.” Two men died, two others fell, wounded. And so began a night of terror.

It happened 100 years ago this month, but this was not some colonial outpost being brought to heel. This was a street in a Welsh town.

It began when striking railwaymen halted a train from London as it approached Llanelli. They boarded it and put out its fire but were soon forced off by soldiers of the Worcestershire Regiment. They gathered above the railway line and bombarded the soldiers with stones and missiles.

That is what triggered Major Brownlow Stuart’s act of idiocy.

August 1911, when not only our own patch but half the country seemed in a state approaching revolution. A nationwide strike of stevedores, railwaymen and other transport workers protesting at pitifully low wages was bringing Britain to a standstill.

As food ran out there were even fears of famine in some major cities. Fifty thousand troops were sent into London where 200,000 demonstrators had taken to the streets of the city. As massive riots rocked Liverpool, with two men shot dead by soldiers, three warships steamed up the Mersey to protect merchant ships and the great transatlantic liners docked there. Cardiff was recovering from the violence surrounding the seamen’s strike – now it was Llanelli’s turn.

We heard the phrase often during the terrifying race riots in the US during the 1960s and here, that August, we suffered through a truly unforgiving long hot summer. Temperatures reached 100 degrees – in the shade – and, unbelievably to us a century on, the unrelenting heat killed 2,500 children, with London declared the second most unhealthy city in the world, the Thames as foul as the Ganges, disease sweeping through the slums.

On August 15, 40,000 railwaymen, protesting at low pay and long hours, stopped work. Llanelli’s men came out two days later and were joined by men from other industries. They closed the gates at two level crossings, allowing only the mail train through, and almost immediately troops, evidently well prepared, were rushed to the town to reinforce the police.

That is where we came in, that is when the battle began. A local magistrate read the Riot Act but he was ignored, so Major Brownlow Stuart gave his order. Tinplate worker John John, a celebrated local rugby player just 21, and a 19-year-old died. (An inquest would return a verdict of justifiable homicide.)

The deaths signalled the start of rioting and looting that lasted through the night. A wagon at a railway shed was set alight. It was full of explosives, the resulting blast killed two men instantly, three others died in hospital. The troops moved in at midnight and cleared the streets. The strike ended – but there was no respite for South Wales.

As calm came to Llanelli, hundreds of young men rampaged through Tredegar, looting shops owned by the town’s businessmen, inspiring similar attacks in 10 more Monmouthshire mining towns. Since most of the shops were owned by Jews some said that these were the first anti-Jewish riots for 200 years. But these claims were demolished by Prof SWD Rubinstein, a specialist in Jewish history.

He pointed out that non-Jewish shops were also attacked for economic, not racist, reasons by a working class that felt exploited by shopkeepers and landlords.

Earlier that month Britain’s first Labo



Read More http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/columnists/2011/08/09/dan-o-neill-strikers-gunned-down-at-protest-91466-29201599/#ixzz1UcWhmefS

how many sick and disabled are now working

Welfare

I asked how many people are now in work after labour and the Tories back to work, she said no records yet, it will take a few years, I said how many people are now getting IB and ESA, she said no records at the moment. So I said come on you must know a rough guide.

people claiming benefits for sickness and disability now stands at 2.6 million as from July this year.

But hold on hundreds of millions have been spent and yet disability welfare is going up from 2.4 million to 2.6 million, we are told 90% of people are refused benefits because they are scroungers, yet right now welfare is going up.

I'm not a racist well not yet, but could the government like labour in 1997 who knew they were going to do a bit of social engineering by an open door immigration, know that a lot of people who would end up here would in fact end up on welfare, immigrants cannot get welfare, oh yes they can if they come from the EU, or they come here to people who are already here.

Have we seen social engineering within Welfare.

Whats the difference

What is the difference between Labour and the Tories, not a lot really I see Progress is all over it's self telling us getting the workless and worthless back to work is a great idea, and paying job providers to do it well if it works it will be a great idea, they are backing the Tories in this.

I have just come back from my job center, no disability advisors today they have been moved to the job provider, but she's gone off ill again.

But one look at the computer and you find why we still have 16,000 people sitting at home in my area, being wasters, six jobs all six are paying commission only not a single real job.

So how much do we pay the job providers for sitting on their backsides, mine is the Shaw Trust, if it works as hard as it did before god help us all.

Newer Labour

Where is the Labour party going Purnell we are told will become a major player in Milibands government, after his thoughts on child benefits bus passes and the rest.

We are told Mr Miliband will decide to go with our beloved Caroline Flint or her idea's of only giving council houses to people in jobs, and also to people who are doing a specialized job like teacher doctor nurse.

Forgive me for being stupid, I live right next to a council estate where the poorest are trying to get out of, they move to a dogs home then spend a life on this estate, I would not think a nurse doctor or teacher would want to come here if the rent was free. does anyone really think these people will want to live on a sink hole estate I know I did not

So a school teacher on £35,000 cannot afford a mortgage and a person who lets say has a disability would have to move to the private sector, or back to the 1900 into shit poverty housing.

Anyone have any idea where the hell Labour went, and who told flint Purnell and the nose of the year Miliband they were socialist

Sir Digby Jones

OK kids should decide to leave school at fourteen go and get a trade, two days in college and then move into a great deal, you will earn a wage, you will not be able to go back to school oh no this is it , no more beating up teachers boring lessons you will be bored sick working for the council doing a trade like lets see emptying the bins picking up litter. This is the bloke that thought the McDonald training places was the best ever great idea.

Oh god the Labour party and Digby Jones sorry Sir Digby Jones.

Blue Labour Pink Labour

Ed Miliband is set to declare,

http://tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/ed-miliband-goes-blue-labour/

In his speech at a neighbourhood centre in London, Ed Miliband will focus on responsibility and promise to champion one of the core principles pioneered by the architect of the welfare state William Beveridge: the welfare state should reward those who contribute.

Aides stressed this is reviving the principles behind Beveridge’s thinking and does not denote a new national insurance system. “We will be a party that rewards contribution, not worklessness.

Question if a child is born with Cerebral Palsy, or a young eighteen year old Soldier gets his legs blown off, what then, has the young soldier done enough to have his pension, I'd say nope not according to the Huttons, Fields or Purnell and it seems Milibands.

So tell me Blue and Pink Labour what the f*ck are we bothering to vote for. and I think it shows How labour has no idea at all about people.

Miliband a socialite because he's no socialist

To day Miliband talked about the disabled the sick, he stated the use of words like frauds scroungers by the Daily mail, sometimes rightly, he then went off on a rant, ah yes I. still waiting for those who are disabled to have a tattoo and wear a badge to ensure everyone knows who we are, Labour and the Tories blame game. what next work camps with large chimney's.

To be in the TA's or not

So we are told today that the Tories will reduce the Military by 19,000 but increase the TA's, I suspect some form of extra payments or other means of getting the TA's up to strength. But it's the wrong way to go, the front line troops should always be the best trained with the TA's filling in when needed, they should not be front line fodder. I suspect the Tories have plans to ensure no more battles or wars for a while, it costs to much, god help us if the Falklands are attacked again, I suspect both Labour and the Tories would sell it off.

So whom will be sacked, I suspect all those with disabilities all those with problems will go, and then will be those coming to the end of time, officers who's air fields or navy yards, which will close, commanders of ships which are taken out of service unless your one of those with the right name, or contacts.

But today a report was released of course nobody is interested because of the Murdock shit, so it's a god day to release bad news.

It states that our troops were shit on by the Labour party, with us going to war with poor tools to complete the task, Brown stated what ever they needed they would get, but he of course cries a lot at home, or is that tears of laughter.

I think the idea of putting the TA's as our front lines troops no matter how well trained is a mistake, unless of course we are not going to war again.

DWP.... now your in for it

Cheats warned of benefit fraud blitz

Benefit cheats are being warned today that a new Mobile Regional Taskforce to combat fraud will be visiting their area. This new team will target all high risk postcodes across the country re-examining claims for benefits and Tax Credits.

The Taskforce is the latest crack-down on benefit fraud by the Department for Work and Pensions and HMRC alongside local authorities, and cheats are being urged to admit their crimes and pay back the money before they get a knock on the door.

Lord Freud, Minister for Welfare Reform said:


"The new Taskforce is our latest weapon in tackling welfare fraud on the front line. We are sending a clear warning that if you are fiddling the system, you will be caught. Welfare fraud is a crime and takes money away from the most vulnerable.

"People who are receiving the correct benefits and Tax Credits have absolutely nothing to fear. But if people have deliberately not told us of a change in circumstances, they should do so now, before the team comes knocking at their door.

"Alongside the Taskforce we are bringing in the Universal Credit which will simplify and automate the benefits system. This will make it much easier to catch people who make false claims."

People who tell the Department about a change in their circumstances before they are found out by the Taskforce will have to repay the money they owe, and, depending on the seriousness of their action, may face an additional punishment. Anyone who doesn’t take this opportunity and is found by the Taskforce to be committing welfare fraud could be prosecuted and fined or imprisoned.

David Gauke MP, Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury said:


"This government will not tolerate money which is meant for those in genuine need being siphoned off into the pockets of cheats and fraudsters.

"The new taskforce delivers on our commitment to tackle benefit fraud and together with the extra £917 million we have re-invested in HMRC sends a very clear message."

The Taskforce will start on 25 of July in the Perry Barr and Kingstanding area of Birmingham. People can also report a cheat on the National Benefit Fraud Hotline number 0800 854 440 or online via: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/benefit-thieves

This new measure is set out alongside other measures in the fraud and error strategy announced at the end of last year by DWP and HMRC that will reduce annual welfare fraud and error overpayments by one quarter (£1.4 billion) by March 2015 through:
Launching a single fraud investigation service
Accessing more data and using private sector analytical techniques
Increased asset seizure
A new tougher one-strike, two-strike and three-strike rules, including three years for people with multiple convictions
Money owed deducted directly through PAYE
Case-cleaning over 1 million claims to remove official or customer error

Universal Credit, which will replace income-related support from 2013, will simplify the benefit system making it even harder for fraud and error to enter and making the benefit system far easier to administer.

Notes to Editors
The Mobile Regional Taskforce will scrutinise the claims of a high proportion of current benefit customers within a specific geographical location, regardless of age, gender, ethnic make-up, type of benefit recipient, income, disability breakdown or family status.
The Taskforce will begin in Birmingham’s B44 postcode area on 25th July 2011. A full roll out across the country will commence in the autumn.

In October 2010 the Cabinet Office established the Counter Fraud Taskforce, which is chaired by Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office. It is made up of senior officials from government and private sector with expertise in tackling fraud, error and debt. Officials from the National Fraud Authority (an Executive Agency of the Home Office) provide the secretariat to the taskforce.

This Taskforce has overseen eight pilots in different Government departments using the latest technology to tackle fraud in the public sector. Some of these have made immediate savings:
HMRC: £256 million over 4 years by using data analytical techniques to screen tax credit applications before payments are made
HMRC: £750 million over 2 years using credit reference agency data to detect undisclosed partners
DWP: £490 million over 4 years using credit reference agency data to detect undisclosed partners
HMG: £264 million on payments to suppliers made in 2009/10, using analytical techniques to detect overpayments through fraud or error. DfT pilot saved £0.5m and the Home office saved £4m using these techniques.

What a country

Everything is now about the hacking, even Gordon Brown jumps in with wise words, sadly he was not wise enough to hold an inquiry blaming everyone else except him self.

Talk about a good time to hide the world going bang, Italy is now looking like the next country that needs billions, but heck was not the president prime minister not running around the world telling us Italy was great again.

The UK we are told Afghanistan is now OK it's fine we are with drawing our troops, and then sack them lay them off.

Aircraft carriers costing billions more then they should little wonder we would not want to built to much here, then again the workers know once these ships are finished so is the boat yards. make them last lads.

DLA to PIPs is going through government now , whats being said sod all it's not hacking.


Employment is down but unemployment is of course up hows that for a good one, more people are in work, but yes sadly more people are on the dole, that's political speak for we are fucked.

It's been a great month, but I did enjoy seeing Gordon back in Parliament even if his shirt looked dangerous

DLA or PIP's

It looks like people are getting ready to test this little change in the courts, but as yet nothing has been decided.

I see people are angry that the Tories are saying we need to sort this one out, too many disabled people are getting extra money. But in fact if you look at the lowest rates of DLA you get I believe it's £17.50 this could be due to having say a bad leg , or a bad knee say with Arthritis.

But for my wife who applied for DLA for having spina bifida she was turned down flat, she had to apply a number of times before a doctor said OK you can have the lowest amount, yet I know people who are seriously disabled who are turned down point blank, is it the system, poor doctors, or doctors who do not give a shit.

We had a TV program in Wales about one such doctor who saw numerous people some with such serious disabilities and yet he turned down everyone, nobody got a pass.

Another doctor who was seen by another, the doctor spoke no English how the hell did he get a job, this doctor asked one customer we are customers, that if he had come from this doctors country then he would have to beg, the reply was well lucky I do not come from your country then.

My worry like always this is about cutting benefits again to repay the debts of the bankers, seems the disabled and the sick will be repaying a lot.

But lucky the Tories are going to look at it, Brown did not wish to look at it just stop it.

Good time to be disabled in 20011

Miliband today

To day Miliband obviously came on TV to have ago at the Tories which is great the Tories need to be brought down a step or two. But if your going to demand that the Tories stand up and take the blame you'd better be sure the Tories can not hit you back.

It seems now labour had been told in 2002/3 that in fact peoples phones had been hacked and decided after a quick discussion to do nothing, question why not! was it because you did not wish to up set the owners.

I just think if your going to throw stones you had better be sure your green house has bullet proof Glass.

Why did Miliband go to the Murdock's drink party. and then we get a story about Miliband not going to a Union do because of Bob Crowe, he's not the type of Union man Miliband likes.

God Almighty how much lower can labour go before it disappears up it's own rectum,

Miliband makes it plain where Labour stands.

Forget Miliband shocking show on TV! we should have done more to the News of the world and News International. The question is like always why did you not.

We saw the squeaky return of Blair to protect his earning by protecting his mates.

If this is correct it shows where Blair real feeling are telling a well known MP to stop hounding the Murdock's.

Anyway how about Miliband feeling on being classed to the left, Andrew Marrs question went down like a bomb the smile on Miliband face was the look alike Browns.

No said Eddie the Eagle Miliband as he skied toward that tree, we are to the center, we are in the middle we are yes New labour.

Must be getting mighty difficult in the center of the political divide with the Slightly red Tories or so we are told, the slightly blue labour and the poor old Liberals, all we want now is for the BNP to tell us they love Black people and immigrants and the center ground would be block up

News of the world hacking

OK it's wrong it's evil and people should go to jail, and any party that new about it should be saying the people who did know should be placed on trial.

OK being disabled New labour decided I would need to have a voice speech recognition or lie detector, labour hired a private company to go around checking all our bank accounts, labour decided that we needed ID cards so you Knew who was getting benefits and who was hard working tax payers. Then we had right of entry labour decided any council official could enter my home check my belongs to ensure I was not living above my standard, even my Tesco club card was checked.

I see Miliband now talking about the bad Tories but come on are your really telling me this lot did nothing wrong.

The email scandal of making Cameron and his wife look bad with slander and lies McBride, I think people throwing stones you better be clean your self.

News of the World has gone ended?

So the News Of The World has gone, none of the top rank bosses are expected to lose a job the top job of the editor will I suspect go to one of the other major players in News International. But what about the poor sods who work for a living who do not have the nod of Murdock.

Coulson is innocent we are told by Cameron only a few months ago, now he has gone and Cameron will do what ever he can to sort this out, Miliband comes out raging about fairness, Jesus this from a party who uses the influence of Tony Blair to keep this same gang on side for Labour.

My heart bleeds for Cameron and Miliband with their fake shame attacks.

Now then we will see a Police inquiry lets hope none of the Police are on the pay roll of taking pay backs for information.

Labour are saying this is showing the Tories in a bad light, but if you go back to check who was in charge when it started we find Blair and brown at the helm.

laugh it makes me hurt when I see Miliband showing he cares, all he is doing is finding that niche which he believes can get him back to the top leader of the small c Tories.

Labour to become a new party in Scotland Irn Bru

The re-branding of labour is on it's way, we are told Miliband has been open about the new idea in Scotland to become the Irn Bru of Scotland. A soft drink, well I think myself you should be looking at making a lot of labour politicians drink the stuff lots of it, to get some iron in your spines. We are told Scotland is to take charge of it's MSP, it's MP's and it councilors, not a bad idea for Scotland. I think we are already seeing the splintering of labour into a factional party, but of course if that wins Miliband and his tribe the leadership heck why not.

We are told Labour in England will go ahead looking to get funding from out side of the Unions, yes but we will not break with the Unions, no I bet, not not while they pay your dam wages mate.

We are told Labour England is to chase it's middle class vote, while Scotland since the SNP is more socialist, I suspect labour will chase the rich middle class Tory vote.

Wales we are told is now a socialist party, but when you see all this re-branding it's a joke because in the end, all it's for is to give Miliband the leadership.

Quick lets get that Independence vote going.

Jobs these are the jobs

CAFE COOK Add to shortlist
Company:xxxxxxx Cafe Salary:£5.93 PER HOURLocation:LLANELLI, DYFEDPrevious experience would be an advantage. Duties include cooking of breakfasts and lunches and keeping the kitchen clean and tidy. There will be a probationary period of 1 month. Completed Jobcentre Plus application form to be returned to employer's...

Block | Flag | More options...

4 days ago from: Directgov
FREELANCE PERSONAL TRAINER Add to shortlist
Company:xxxxxx xxxxxx Health and Fitness Centre Salary:MEETS NAT MIN WAGELocation:xxxxx, xxxxxxxx, DYFEDThis is a self employed vacancy. We are looking for a well motivated and professional individual. An opportunity to rent space with in a brand new popular health and fitness centre. You will be delivering a one on one personal training service to members...

Block | Flag | More options...

4 days ago from: Directgov
LED LIGHTING SALES REPRESENTATIVE Add to shortlist
Company:xxxxxx LED Lighting UK Ltd Salary:COMMISSION ONLYLocation:xxxx,xxxxxxx DYFEDThis is a self employed vacancy. No experience needed as training will be given. Relevant knowledge within the field is required. Sales experience would be an advantage. Duties will include generating new business by telephone and site visits and any...

Block | Flag | More options...

16 days ago from: Directgov
xxxx CONSULTANT Add to shortlist
Company:xxxx Associates Ltd (The) Salary:OTE £30,000 - £75,000 PER ANNUMLocation:xxxxxx, DYFEDThis is a self employed vacancy. The company has given an assurance that this vacancy enables workers to achieve a wage equivalent to the National Minimum Wage rate. Sales or financial services experience preferred. Experience is not essential as full...

Block | Flag | More options...
17 days ago from: Directgov



Notice commision or self employed and I,m supposed to jump at these. these are the jobs available in my area, I find most are self employed and commision oonly.

The big push now is self employed

Blue labour

Blue labour we are told is a new Political group to fight to win the next election.

Who is in it well a few of great socialist like Cruddas, the bloke who did not even bother voting on labour welfare reforms, but voted against at the Tories attempts.

And then they have the greatest lefty since Nye Bevan the one and only Purnell "Not"

One step closer to a two tier NHS

Field said he had decided not to address the cap because of mixed feedback from hospitals – at University Hospital Birmingham the cap is set at 1% while the Royal Marsden in London's cap is set at about 30%.

"So University Hospital Birmingham couldn't bring money in which would actually help its NHS services," Field said as he pointed out that lifting the cap would leave hospitals more vulnerable to competition law. "On the other hand, if you opened the cap it may be more likely to be under … EU law, and from competition and from Monitor. So when we weighed up the proposals and the problems that might arise we chose not to go into any great detail."

John Healey, Labour's shadow health secretary, said: "Steve Field is right and this was a serious omission from the Future Forum report. Removing the private patients' cap is a vital feature of the government's plans to turn the health service into a full-scale market, which will see NHS patients waiting longer and open up hospitals to greater challenge under competition law."

Sue Slipman, the director of the Foundation Trust Network, said it was right to lift the cap. Slipman told MPs: "Depending upon the range of patient choices, it isn't necessarily the case that there would be fewer NHS patients if you expand the facilities as a result of the money you can [raise]. It depends where you invest that money.

"The term 'private patient cap' is a misnomer. This is all money that can be brought into the system as a result of any service which may derive from private patients. So, for example, if you run laundry in your hospital and any of that laundry is used by those who supply services to private patients, this counts against the cap. We believe that the lifting of the private patient cap would enable public providers to being more money into the NHS to benefit NHS patients."

The BMA membership rejected leader Dr Hamish Meldrum's attempts to reassure them that key elements of the bill should not damage the NHS.

Their motion said there was still anxiety about:

• The role of the NHS regulator Monitor. They fear it will still promote competition between hospitals, even though Meldrum insisted that "competition has gone" as Monitor's main duty as a result of changes following the NHS Future Forum.

Field said he had decided not to address the cap because of mixed feedback from hospitals – at University Hospital Birmingham the cap is set at 1% while the Royal Marsden in London's cap is set at about 30%.

"So University Hospital Birmingham couldn't bring money in which would actually help its NHS services," Field said as he pointed out that lifting the cap would leave hospitals more vulnerable to competition law. "On the other hand, if you opened the cap it may be more likely to be under … EU law, and from competition and from Monitor. So when we weighed up the proposals and the problems that might arise we chose not to go into any great detail."

John Healey, Labour's shadow health secretary, said: "Steve Field is right and this was a serious omission from the Future Forum report. Removing the private patients' cap is a vital feature of the government's plans to turn the health service into a full-scale market, which will see NHS patients waiting longer and open up hospitals to greater challenge under competition law."

Sue Slipman, the director of the Foundation Trust Network, said it was right to lift the cap. Slipman told MPs: "Depending upon the range of patient choices, it isn't necessarily the case that there would be fewer NHS patients if you expand the facilities as a result of the money you can [raise]. It depends where you invest that money.

"The term 'private patient cap' is a misnomer. This is all money that can be brought into the system as a result of any service which may derive from private patients. So, for example, if you run laundry in your hospital and any of that laundry is used by those who supply services to private patients, this counts against the cap. We believe that the lifting of the private patient cap would enable public providers to being more money into the NHS to benefit NHS patients."

The BMA membership rejected leader Dr Hamish Meldrum's attempts to reassure them that key elements of the bill should not damage the NHS.

Their motion said there was still anxiety about:

• The role of the NHS regulator Monitor. They fear it will still promote competition between hospitals, even though Meldrum insisted that "competition has gone" as Monitor's main duty as a result of changes following the NHS Future Forum.
Field said he had decided not to address the cap because of mixed feedback from hospitals – at University Hospital Birmingham the cap is set at 1% while the Royal Marsden in London's cap is set at about 30%.

"So University Hospital Birmingham couldn't bring money in which would actually help its NHS services," Field said as he pointed out that lifting the cap would leave hospitals more vulnerable to competition law. "On the other hand, if you opened the cap it may be more likely to be under … EU law, and from competition and from Monitor. So when we weighed up the proposals and the problems that might arise we chose not to go into any great detail."

John Healey, Labour's shadow health secretary, said: "Steve Field is right and this was a serious omission from the Future Forum report. Removing the private patients' cap is a vital feature of the government's plans to turn the health service into a full-scale market, which will see NHS patients waiting longer and open up hospitals to greater challenge under competition law."

Sue Slipman, the director of the Foundation Trust Network, said it was right to lift the cap. Slipman told MPs: "Depending upon the range of patient choices, it isn't necessarily the case that there would be fewer NHS patients if you expand the facilities as a result of the money you can [raise]. It depends where you invest that money.

"The term 'private patient cap' is a misnomer. This is all money that can be brought into the system as a result of any service which may derive from private patients. So, for example, if you run laundry in your hospital and any of that laundry is used by those who supply services to private patients, this counts against the cap. We believe that the lifting of the private patient cap would enable public providers to being more money into the NHS to benefit NHS patients."

The BMA membership rejected leader Dr Hamish Meldrum's attempts to reassure them that key elements of the bill should not damage the NHS.

Their motion said there was still anxiety about:

• The role of the NHS regulator Monitor. They fear it will still promote competition between hospitals, even though Meldrum insisted that "competition has gone" as Monitor's main duty as a result of changes following the NHS Future Forum.


Field said he had decided not to address the cap because of mixed feedback from hospitals – at University Hospital Birmingham the cap is set at 1% while the Royal Marsden in London's cap is set at about 30%.

"So University Hospital Birmingham couldn't bring money in which would actually help its NHS services," Field said as he pointed out that lifting the cap would leave hospitals more vulnerable to competition law. "On the other hand, if you opened the cap it may be more likely to be under … EU law, and from competition and from Monitor. So when we weighed up the proposals and the problems that might arise we chose not to go into any great detail."

John Healey, Labour's shadow health secretary, said: "Steve Field is right and this was a serious omission from the Future Forum report. Removing the private patients' cap is a vital feature of the government's plans to turn the health service into a full-scale market, which will see NHS patients waiting longer and open up hospitals to greater challenge under competition law."

Sue Slipman, the director of the Foundation Trust Network, said it was right to lift the cap. Slipman told MPs: "Depending upon the range of patient choices, it isn't necessarily the case that there would be fewer NHS patients if you expand the facilities as a result of the money you can [raise]. It depends where you invest that money.

"The term 'private patient cap' is a misnomer. This is all money that can be brought into the system as a result of any service which may derive from private patients. So, for example, if you run laundry in your hospital and any of that laundry is used by those who supply services to private patients, this counts against the cap. We believe that the lifting of the private patient cap would enable public providers to being more money into the NHS to benefit NHS patients."

The BMA membership rejected leader Dr Hamish Meldrum's attempts to reassure them that key elements of the bill should not damage the NHS.

Their motion said there was still anxiety about:

• The role of the NHS regulator Monitor. They fear it will still promote competition between hospitals, even though Meldrum insisted that "competition has gone" as Monitor's main duty as a result of changes following the NHS Future Forum.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jun/28/nhs-private-patients-doubts

Another great socialist MP

I see Ms Angela Smith is showing us her great Socialist prognoses.

Check out her comments on the Progress site a site well known for it's socialism, Joking of course.

Ms Smith use to remember a chap living by her who had an old car, it was polished shining, he'd come home park it and look after it, he'd polish it in his blue overalls he was hard working, council house family man, his house was nice.

His car was old but shinning because he had pride.

Then again Angela for working all those long hours you'd think a Labour Government would have paid him enough so he could have bought a nice new car.


These people come from another world, she was elected of course on a women only short list, what a shock taking a Tory strong hold, well she was more Tory I suspect then the Tory.

But this idea that we have millions according to the ONS we have nearly 8.5 million people unemployed at the moment that means registered unemployed but not getting JSA a trick Blair and Thatcher knew about.

But right now in my area if your disabled it's almost impossible to get a job, if your not disabled it's almost impossible to get a job, but hell this is Wales.


The sooner we in Wales make a bloody break from buffoons in England and leave the Tory-ish New labour party the better.

Nothing like pride in the dead who die for this country, proud of our people seems not if your a Tory.

For several years, the flag-draped coffins of fallen servicemen and women have been met by large crowds who line the streets to pay their respects as they return to British soil.

But repatriation flights are to be diverted and will no longer be flown back to RAF Lyneham and through the small Wiltshire town of Royal Wootton Bassett, where they were saluted come rain or shine.

Instead, they will arrive back to RAF Brize Norton, where they will be driven through the back gate and then down side roads, neatly avoiding the nearby town of Carterton, as they make their way to the John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford.

Andrew Robathan, Minister for Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans, admitted that the decision to avoid public scenes of emotion had been taken deliberately.

“The side gate was seen by the Ministry of Defence and the police as the most appropriate way to take out future corteges,”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/8599504/War-dead-to-be-driven-down-side-streets-to-avoid-the-public.html


That has to be the biggest disgrace that can be placed on our dead, that and dying for a lie of course.

we should be honouring these people all over the country and proud that they gave their lives, not bloody hiding them....

Refounding labour or just floundering

So the big meeting in Wrexham lots of big words to the socialist Welsh labour party, must have stuck in Miliband throat. Then we had the normal sell off of what was wrong with Labour but hello we did get somethings right.

Like well School building program, yes but was it correct to build them using PFI.

Then Hospital building OK yes but was it right to flog them off to private firms and again PFI.

Then we have Jobs millions given jobs, but of course were these job real, labour them selves stated they had to reduce the amount of people working in the public sector, Brown him self stated he wanted 300,000 jobs to go. So how many jobs did Labour make in my small Welsh town, not a lot really, he closed the benefits office, he closed the tax office and he closed our DWP, so he closed more then he actually made.


Then of course we had the sorry of those poor people who have cancer, he then spoiled his attempt to make the Tories look bad by saying some of these people worked hard and paid into the pot, well so what about the children who are born with cancer or the youths who get cancer before working are these people out side of society, what about people given Blood transfusions now have Aids, what about people who have contracted HIV, or are they naughty for having sex. God help the poor old drug addicts under Newer labour your to blame for everything.

But the fact is those poor cancer suffers who worked so hard paid into the pots are only going through the new medicals because of Labour. I quote Mr Blair people must have medicals to ensure they are suffering and are not just work shy, well I suspect people with Cancer broken backs spinal injuries HIV AIDS and the many many more mental health issues , soldiers with out legs without arms are all so called work shy because they have had their bloody arms and legs blown off.


This is not refounding labour it's a party floundering to find a reason to be.

Job center

Down I go into the main doors to be met by security, yes Mate can we help you, it's my disability appointment with my special adviser mate.

Lets check sorry your name's not on here, but she did leave you three job applications, see you next month bye.

I have been getting this now for months, just three job offers which I check and then dump into the bin by the door, this time it's not a taxi driver, but a long distance painter and decorator must be able to work at heights must be able to work away from home five years experience.

The other one was cold calling for a cosmetic firm, and the other was loans selling.

Ah the choice of jobs we are getting, the special adviser I notice is now working helping the many unemployed find work so she cannot be a special adviser as well.

Nothing like good old government treatment.
Never mind.

The London games 2012 football

Great News we will have a team in the Olympic games, run of course by England, without talking to anyone England has decided they will have a British Football team, forget asking the other countries.

But of course you will need eleven players, I suspect eight or even eleven will be English one from Ireland one from Scotland and One from Wales well they have to have subs. Rumour doing the rounds it will be the under twenty one squad, which should mean a short playing period.

Then we will have the highlight of watching FIFA repay the arguments over bribery by stating England has proved beyond doubt that we have one national team called GB which of course will be Run by the English FA, how many players from out side of England, not to long ago England said any player who had been in the UK for ten years who has not played for any other national team could be eligible for England.

What a bloody nerve.

Newer labour

I watched Ed Miliband to day PMQ's according to labour list of course Ed won the tiff hands down 100 points, but actually he did not, once he brought out the silly DNA Data base idea, he was on a loser I can see people all over the country thinking yes it's newer labour. Blair's idea, Blair's plan put in place by a new labour Eddie the eagle Miliband.

labour it looks to me has nothing to offer ordinary working people, the silly idea that getting a DNA swab from a lady who says she was raped would not prove rape, all it proves is sex has taken place, it would again come down to the same battle she said no he would say she said yes.

But whom wants to be on a register of DNA so insurance companies could carry out a review of your insurance risk because your DNA state you might die of a heart attack or cancer.

I suspect labour has not given up on ID cards either another Blair toy.

Tory MP says work for lower pay..... shocking no not really

Tory back Bencher who has a habit of silly comments state the disabled should be allowed to opt out of the min wage, labour See's red, well nice to see anything red in labour these days.

Mr Davies the chap who said he cannot see the problem with people darkening up their faces, has come up with a few ripe replies.

But is he wrong, the new WCA is now placing more disabled people onto JSA job seekers which is of course £67 a week, not enough to live on, so why should a disabled person not sell his labour for say £4 an hour, work for six months and then get paid if they can do the job the full wage.

Disabled people like myself are not getting jobs because when we go for work a dozen other people many fit and healthy apply as well and to be honest why would an employer employ me.

Well labour stated I must sell my self do not look down look up look forward, easy to say when your sitting in a wheelchair, and the company wants a person to fill shelves and they say to you can you fill the top shelf and you say nope.

Or can you climb a ladder, or can you walk a mile can you drive a car, yes but only if you put in hand controls that cost £10,000.

In most countries laws are in place that companies who employ twenty or more employee's must employ two or three disabled people but not here, I have to prove to everyone I can do the job, and the simple fact I cannot fill shelves, I cannot pick up litter and I cannot write a letter faster then a full trained person.

So my only thing left is to let me or allow me to sell myself on the market. Because living on £67 a week JSA is not something I want...or of course make a real medical test for the disabled not this shame we have now.

Labour whats new.

I was talking to this gent by me who is getting on a bit now, he has a disability from a mine accident a long time ago which took his leg off. I said my grand father lost his legs when a pit prop broke, he said same thing.

I said about how labour was changing and had changed under Kinnock and then Blair, and he said to me labour was not the party people think it is. He said I can go way back before the war, he said even after the war people make out labour to be this socialist party sent to help the people, he said well it never helped me much.

Got me remembering the days at Aberfan, I was in the valleys that day, and saw the Miners rushing over the mountains to get to the school. I was thinking about Wilson who has just won an election and the ex MP Robens who was with the NCB, who did not arrive at the village a day late. He then demanded the charity money be used to clear up the mess including the waste tips the slag heaps, when Wilson stated the money would come from the NCB this gent stated it would not and he demanded that the charity money be used, and it was. OK Blair returned the money many years later but it does I suspect show how we think labour was some how socialist.

I remember the fighting between the Tories and labour over DLA for the disabled and how labour felt it was money wasted.

I see Miliband now is carrying on his idea telling us a story about a chap he knows who's disabled, Miliband stated i believe he was able to work, he believed, what happens if that chap had terminal cancer, or if he has something else wrong with him is Mr Miliband a doctor now, or is it like many in labour who surmise what they think is going on.

I'm no fan of the Tories but if I had a choice right now on voting I'd vote Tory or maybe not, but i do know it would not be labour that's for sure

Miliband on grafters

Grafter labour is the party of grafters, in my area that means frauds people who graft steal, perhaps expenses, who's party have four leading MP's in jail, oh yes Labours grafters.

I cannot wait to see how labour will put into place the private sector jobs to get those grafters back to work, mind you perhaps some of those MP's people like Purnell and the Milibands them selves could do with a few years of grafting out on a building site, but of course thats not going to happen is it.

Dear god Labours dead long live the Tories.

Blair is back or is it Miliband

Miliband speech we are told will be about getting council housing for the middle class, the nurses the police officers you know the important middle class earners who would not be seen dead in council houses around me, the sick the disabled those on JSA well where do they go now, interment camps, tents, kicked out.

I'm not sure where the hell labour is going hopefully out of power for the rest of my life thats for sure.

But Miliband is seeking that niche, the NHS he has lost as the Tories do a U turn, so labour has to find another method of getting those people who now would vote UKIP/ Tory rather then labour.

Pretty shock if the releases of his speech is right, upper class, middle class lower class, and untouchables.

But if the past 13 years how many jobs did labour make in the private sector which can be classed as real jobs, I know they produced a hell of a lot of non jobs in the public sector. how do we get people back to work in my area people are not turning up to chase a job because they have ten jobs and 14,000 people looking for them, last week i was down at my job center seeking to find work, as cripples do, to be told they had 9 positions.

remind me how many council houses did the so caloled labour party build in 13 years.

Labour matters

No it does not but the site Labour matters has just given me the accolade of being banned for attacking Tony Blair for not being a socialist and not being able to see past my hate of the party.

This is because I tried to argue Tony Blair book is a load of crap written to try and make his third way look as if it worked.

I mean he was on TV this week to talk about his New Book and was really annoyed to be asked was he sorry about the war in Iraq, was he really right to go to war.

The problem for Blair now of course his third way blew up and in part was due to Labour being out of power, he did not have the guts to sack Brown, and did not have the guts to stay and fight another election, deals done in back rooms tend to back fire when the other person you did the deal with is an idiot.

We are now looking back at Labour spell in power watching Miliband squirm because everything he and the new labour lot agreed with is being put in place by the Tories, and all labour have letf is to argue for the NHS.

Problem is the country has changed many more people have private insurance and to be honest it's only the people at the bottom of the pile who are really worried over the NHS, but not really enough to fight for it.

Why not because we had thirteen years of labour privatization, and the MRSA epidemic.


Milibands lot right now are unable to say to much because he agrees in principle with the cuts being carried out by the Tories, he agrees with the welfare reforms, but has doubts about the rents, he also came out meekly about the cuts for the elderly only because the Grey vote normally would be seen as a labour vote.

What a mess for a party as the Revelation come out about the back stabbing of Blair, myself I would have stabbed him face to face, but thats not politics is it.

I do like you but leave.

Brown! Tony will you leave, "no"

God almighty we all knew something was going on in the back rooms of number 11 as our loved leaders fought over the top job, we had Miliband saying not me, we had ball's saying rubbish, Balls leaves his office and leaves all the paper work behind, which sadly shows that these people should never be allowed back into power again, but Browns whole life was about the use of the knife in the back in his climb up the ladder to the top.

I just think Labour will take a long long time to get people to accept them again, labour will need to sort out democracy within the party.

What a mess children playing the power game, I want to be prefect I will give you more sweets.

New Think tank for the left

GEER which I'm told will place the left in the center of labour thinking, it will highlight the gender problems of not enough women in politics, of race, not enough people from Minorities, it will state race gender and religion.

I spent a while reading through it and something hit me, it's more like something from the Blue labour, nothing at all about Welfare, the disabled will soon be asked or told to have their National insurance number tattooed onto their arms, and maybe wear a nice picture of a wheelchair on our shirts jumpers or jackets and report to a police station once a week.

This new think tank looks a lot like many of Labours blogs people who are looking to catch the parties eye to end up being asked to come on board a nice jobs as a adviser, or can you stand in a nice safe seat for us.

I was reading a bit about how labour see the next secretaries task once he or she well he takes over, first job will be according to the so called left will be to ensure donations pour in from people so labour can stop taking from the Unions, of course what that means is the new person must push like hell to get state funding.

Nothing would make me look at Labour at the moment and decide I would want to vote for it.

my od computer paced up

After so many years of getting bits and bobs to keep my computer running it packed up and died a death. The mother board decided it was time for a funeral, I have had to borrow a lap top for which the key board is to small for my fingers.

Shopping for a new one will start next week.

Red Ed

So Miliband says again the middle class are the people to make of break Labour, the working class are mostly thick uneducated morons who would vote Labour even if it became New Labour. So the battle is set Labour must get back the swing voters of the hard pressed middle class, who are suffering under the Tories.

I suspect the poorest can see the taxation go up again as Labour would press forward with cutting the poorest within the middle class.

It must be me but the battle is now on to see which of the blue core parties Tory Labour liberals who can win back those pesky middle class swingers who swung back to the Tories.

Me I swinging out of bothering to vote.

MUFC

My grandsons have informed me that today is the day, FA cup, and their team Manchester United will be crowned champions.

Being a Liverpool fan myself I will have to sit and grin and bare it, otherwise my life will not be worth living.......

What next

Just talking to my local councilor about life and he said how do you feel about the new labour regime going into the blue. I said pardon, he said what do you think of Blue labour with Purnell and Cruddas and to some degree Mandy.

I said it does not suprise me new labour was in fact a poor copy of the Tories anyway, so to get back in you have to have a gimmick of getting back the Tory voters. He said is that what you think, well I said why not call it red labour then, or is red some how seen as being socialist, and blue is seen as what.

Job center

I've been told to wait until they can sort out whom is the new job provider, the Job Center does not think it can work with the disabled if a new provider is going to take over.

And I was informed that the job center has to work with able bodied people who are seeking work as they are now a priority, nothing like being told your not a priority to lift one's spirit

hansard

The Government have a massive programme to reassess more than 1.5 million people on incapacity benefit by 2013 to see whether they qualify for employment and support allowance. However, the assessment process is deeply flawed. Forty per cent of appeals are successful, and there is widespread dissatisfaction with Atos Healthcare, the company carrying out the assessments. There are also serious concerns with the way that the process is being handled. The descriptors in the work capability assessment have been repeatedly revised over recent years so as to raise the bar for claimants. Further changes are now being rushed through before Professor Harrington has concluded the all-important second stage of his review, against the advice of the Social Security Advisory Committee. In particular, the committee felt that the work capability assessment measured theoretical work capability and took insufficient account of the realities of the work environment and the labour market, which has not enabled significant numbers to move into employment, even in relatively favourable pre-recession conditions. Some 92 per cent of employers say that they would find it difficult or impossible to employ someone who is blind or partially sighted, for instance. Now we learn that increasing numbers of disabled people are experiencing rigorous reassessments of their access-to-work support packages, which is hardly going to ameliorate the situation.

Even if you qualify for ESA—employment and support allowance—you may be no better off, because anyone receiving contributory ESA from next April who is in the work-related activity group will have payment of their benefit means tested after 12 months. This change is to be made retrospective. People will still be able to apply for income-related ESA after their contributory ESA ends, but if their partner is earning as little as £150 or working 24 hours or more a week, they will no longer be eligible for ESA. These are particularly savage policies going far beyond anything contemplated in the Thatcher era. They will cause great hardship and have a devastating effect on the lives of hundreds of thousands of disabled people. It is estimated that by 2015-16, 700,000 people will be affected by limiting contributory ESA to one year: 203,000 will lose on average £11 a week; 217,000 will lose £22 a week; and 280,000, a good 40 per cent, will lose as much as £89 a week. To people forced to live on benefit, these figures are mind-boggling.

Lords on Welfare

Some very good speeches today and some total rubbish, especially from Lord Sawyer about Remploy helping people. I have yet to see a Job Provider who employs disabled people, or in fact employ older people, the Shaw Trust and Remploy have for sometime employed people on the grounds of paying the min of the min wage in other words they pay people the youth rate of the min wage, what you get then are people who have no idea of the real world. I get fed up going to see a New Job provider and I can tell word for word what they will say.

I'm not disabled myself, but I know somebody who is, thats nice.

The fact is at the moment jobs are short and when jobs are sort employers are looking for the best, they do not want some dribbling retard to do the jobs a Polish worker can do ten times better, and yes I do dribble.

The fact is I have seen some people tell me that I should have been put down at birth, but I was fine at birth I had my accident when I was thirty nine.

It's been an eye opener to listen to the Tories in the house of Lords talk about the welfare reforms and listen to the New labour brigade.

voting over what do we have....

Not a lot has changed in Wales, Labour I suspect will go into a coalition with the Liberals, may as well they messed up in England perhaps labour can help them in Wales, but will the Liberals fall for it.

I was talking about welfare reforms to a councilor at the polling station, ah yes he said I've not noticed to many disabled people, I asked how can you tell if they are disabled, oh he said thinking they drive new cars. Well thats it then if you drive a new car in Wales your disabled.

My friend who has been disabled all his life has been told his contract at a retail Unit will not be renewed this year, he has been working at the place for five years, but he only gets a one year contract.

Then another friend told me he has been laid off as well, he said they had told him they were getting rid of non essential jobs, which is like telling somebody your a waste of time and we are getting rid of you.

Then I hear that a person who works for the council is being let go, as they try to save money now get this, she was told they had to do this to try and keep essential people. Nothing like knowing your getting the sack because your non essential.

I cannot wait to see where the hell I will be going to find work.

Are you disabled come tell us?????

I'm parplegic but that means nothing these days, nothing at all.


Rising from sitting and transferring from one seated position to another:
Cannot complete both of the following—

(a) rise to standing from sitting in an upright chair without receiving physical assistance from someone else; and

(b) move between one seated position and another seated position located next to one another without receiving physical assistance from someone else

If a claimant can do either one of these activities they are not eligible for the Support Group.
Again, this descriptor reflects a severe restriction of lower and upper limb function. Again, the claimant who has quadriplegia may fulfil these requirements. A claimant with paraplegia who has reasonable upper limb function may not fall into this support group as they may have good ability to independently transfer from one seat to another.
Information must be obtained at the pre-board check to confirm details of their disability and likelihood of restriction of both the rising and transferring activities. (See section 3.3 for further details of assessment at the LCW/LCWRA medical examination of this type of activity).

Whom to vote for?

I took a long hard look I have been voting since 1967 elections, Assembly elections, Unions, you name it I've voted at it.

In 2005 I left the Labour party I've supported them from the age of twelve, but after new labour and Blair articles about work shy scroungers within Disability it was time to go.

So whom do I vote for today, Labour in Wales we are told is not labour England, it's easy to say, I cannot in all honesty believe that, they might well sound more left, but I think that has more to do with the coalition. Would Labour back the welfare reforms put in place by the Tories, according to Miliband yes he would, so that's it I will not be voting labour.

I cannot even be bothered about the Tories the hit on the working class, disabled, sick and poor, it's to cut no other reason.

Liberals well they sold out did not even bother taking any of the baggage with them, one minute they are fighting against welfare reforms the next Clegg is telling us they cannot afford it, I cannot be bothered with the Liberals the old Whig beliefs have shown them selves again.


For me right now, I'm leaning toward the local party or independents, they will never control the country and to be honest they make a rubbish job of my council, but they did say welfare reforms was wrong.

But boy it's getting hard to find a reason to vote these days.

Is he disabled seems not?

FATHER of five crippled with chronic arthritis, heart disease and gout was told he was fit enough to work as part of a review of disability benefit claimants.

Said Rohamed, aged 64, was forced to give up work at the GKN Hardy Spicer factory in Erdington 15 years ago due to his arthritis.

He has been claiming Disabled Living Allowances (DLA) for care and mobility, currently worth about £400 a month, ever since.

The divorced father, who has three grown-up sons and two daughters, has also suffered a heart attack, survived prostrate cancer and has asthma.

But, following a 20-minute interview with a Department for Work and Pensions doctor, his DLA was stopped because he was deemed fit enough to work.

The decision also meant that Mr Rohamed, who lives alone in a flat in Bridley Drive in Birmingham city centre, would have to give up his mobility scooter



Read More http://www.birminghammail.net/news/top-stories/2011/05/04/birmingham-disabled-dad-loses-allowances-in-government-crackdown-97319-28629483/#ixzz1LYW8QGNH

So whom do I vote for.

I have had to listen to a number of parties speaking at my door or in Town, I tend to walk way but to listen to labour tell us that tuitions fee's are a disgrace is interesting, who brought in tuition fee's yes labour.

We are told the sale and the sell off of the NHS will be fought, yet in my small town you can pop in see a doctor pay your £35 be seen get treatments, where as my own GP the appointment can take a month, your seen for twelve minutes and told if you have not finished to make another appointment which takes another month.

To get my blood pressure done, I was informed it would be better if I had it done at a chemist and the phone the results through saving the GP time and pressure.

Go to see a dentist not in my area we still do not have any, and thats all down to labour.

Education we are told labour has done more for education then anyone else, they why is it children are still leaving school unable to read and write.

The Tories are no better thats true, but the difference in ideology between labour and the Tories are now much closer together.

Tomorrow is voting day and I'm not to sure to even bother voting.

Reading in April

Summary of the Bill
The Bill provides for the introduction of a 'Universal Credit' to replace a range of existing means-tested benefits and tax credits for people of working age, starting from 2013. The Bill follows the November 2010 White Paper, 'Universal Credit: welfare that works', which set out the Coalition Government’s proposals for reforming welfare to improve work incentives, simplify the benefits system and tackle administrative complexity.

Besides introducing Universal Credit and related measures, the Bill makes other significant changes to the benefits system.

Key areas

•introduces Personal Independence Payments to replace the current Disability Living Allowance
•restricts Housing Benefit entitlement for social housing tenants whose accommodation is larger than they need
•up-rates Local Housing Allowance rates by the Consumer Price Index
•amends the forthcoming statutory child maintenance scheme
•limits the payment of contributory Employment and Support Allowance to a 12-month period
•caps the total amount of benefit that can be claimed

He's dead

So after knowing where he was last year, the Americans finally took out Bin Laden, but we are hearing the Americans knew about this house or fort for at least four years.

So why today have the CIA special forces decided to end this man life, no doubt he was evil nasty little bit of vermin, but could this have anything to do with Obama ratings going through the floor, now of course he is sure to win the election as the hero of the USA.

Nothing works better then a dead terrorist before an election.

Ok lets get this one going

I have been advised by the job center to wait until the new job providers are sorted then I will be seen and sorted.

It's been hell of a year, a small lump on my arm started itching and I though get some cream, the chemist said he did not like it, popped into the doctor who wrote to the hospital, my GP phones up says you need to be seen fast pronto, best go private, £150 quid cheap as chips, skin cancer.

It did not look like anything, I mean working in the building trade I was always getting my arms sun tanned never burned, doctor stated god your Lucky a few more months and it would be a different story. How much more bad luck can I have for god sake.

Then my father in law goes to hospital ,who say he is OK do not worry, he dies.

I sit at home thinking hell what next, when I get a call you will soon get your letter from the DWP for your ESA medical.

Anyone have a rope.